Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE Lean interventions aim to improve quality of healthcare by reducing waste and facilitate flow in work processes. There is conflicting evidence on the outcomes of lean thinking, with quantitative and qualitative studies often contradicting each other. We suggest that reviewing the literature within the approach of a new contextual framework can deepen our understanding of lean as a quality-improvement method. This article theorises the concept of context by establishing a two-dimensional conceptual framework acknowledging lean as complex social interventions, deployed in different organisational dimensions and domains. The specific aim of the study was to identify factors facilitating intended outcomes from lean interventions, and to understand when and how different facilitators contribute. DESIGN A two-dimensional conceptual framework was developed by combining Shortell's Dimensions of capability with Walshes' Domains of an intervention. We then conducted a systematic review of lean review articles concerning hospitals, published in the period 2000-2012. The identified lean facilitators were categorised according to the intervention domains and dimensions of capability provided by the framework. RESULTS We provide a framework emphasising context by relating facilitators to domains and dimensions of capability. 23 factors enabling a successful lean intervention in hospitals were identified in the systematic review, where management and a supportive culture, training, accurate data, physicians and team involvement were most frequent. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of evidence, the two-dimensional framework, incorporating the context, may prove useful for future research on variation in outcomes from lean interventions. Findings from the review suggest that characteristics and local application of lean, in addition to strategic and cultural capability, should be given further attention in healthcare quality improvement.
منابع مشابه
مرور سیستماتیک “Systematic Review” چیست وچگونه نگاشته میشود؟
Abstract Background: Successful clinical decisions are the outcome of a complex process. In making them, we draw on information from scientific evidences, our personal experience and external rules and constraints. Considering that the explosive increase in the amount and quality of the scientific evidence that has come from both the laboratory bench and the bedside, we may lack the time, mo...
متن کاملTelenursing In Cardiovascular Diseases: A Critical Review of Systematic Reviews of Evidence
Introduction: There is a growing interest in telenursing's effect in reducing the burden of chronic diseases. Methods: In this study, a comprehensive review of systematic reviews of the effect of telenursing interventions on primary care of cardiovascular diseases was performed. The reviewed English articles were published between 2000 and 2018. International databases, including CINAHL, Web of...
متن کاملEFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FAVIPIRAVIR IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19: A REVIEW OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSIS
Background & Aims: Favipiravir is an antiviral drug that is widely used in patients with Covid-19. The aim of this study was to review the systematic review and meta-analysis studies of Favipiravir in patients with Covid-19. Materials & Methods: An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases until December 2021. In addition, other database...
متن کاملCerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT) following COVID-19 vaccination: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
Background and Objective: This umbrella review presents comprehensive data on the evidence of the association between cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and COVID-19 vaccinations. Methods: We searched related databases to access issue-related systematic reviews both with meta‐analyses or without it that studied the connotation between COVID 19 vaccination and CVT in any languages from initiatio...
متن کاملAcellular pertussis vaccine efficacy: An updated systematic review and meta –analysis
Background: Recent studies indicate an increased incidence of pertussis disease in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the acellular vaccine for children (as a replacement of current whole cell vaccine in the Expanded Program on Immunization) and for high-risk adults in Iran through updating current best available evidence. Methods: We performed a syste...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014